Some consumers who have purchased home appliances with the “Energy Star” efficiency rating may not have received the appliance they bargained for.
Sheller, P.C. is investigating a potential class action lawsuit involving appliances that were labeled to sell with an "Energy Star" efficiency rating, but in fact did not qualify. Energy Star appliances are generally required to use 10% to 35% less energy than standard models, depending on the type of appliance. Manufacturers of Energy Star appliances typically charge a premium above the price of standard models.
If you purchased any of the appliances listed below, and you would like to discuss your legal rights, please contact us at 800-833-2299, or visit us online at www.sheller.com
Government regulators determined that the appliances listed below did not qualify for an Energy Star rating, despite being sold with an Energy Star label:
Product Type
Organization Name
Product Model Number
Date Disqualified
Clothes Washers
Equator Appliances
EZ 3720 CEE
10/22/10
Commercial Refrigerators
Perlick
HP48RO-S
7/13/11
Dishwashers
ASKO
D5122ADA
6/30/10
D5122XXLB
6/1/10
D5122XXLS
D5122XXLW
D5122XXLAD
Refrigerators and Freezers
Electrolux
FFTR1817L
6/25/10
EW26SS70I
8/26/11
Frigidaire
FFN09M5HW
12/16/10
LG Electronics
LFX21975ST
1/20/10
LFX25975SB
LFX25975ST
LFX25975SW
LFX28977SB
LFX28977ST
LFX28977SW
LMX25985SB
HP72R00-S
7/14/11
Samsung
RF26VAB
3/22/10
Sears/Kenmore
79732
79733
79737
79752
79753
79754
79757
79759
79782
79783
79789
KitchenAid
KSRG25FVMS
9/27/11
KSRS25RV
Summit Appliances
CF11ES
11/8/11
Room Air Conditioners
FRA256ST2
Friedrich
US10C30
CP15F10
US12C10
SM24M30
1/03/12
Midea USA Inc.
MWF08CR
3/9/11
Central Air Conditioner Equipment and Air Source Heat
Thermo Products, LLC
OPB24-80
8/19/11
Ventilating Fans
National HVAC
Zonex GM-80
4/27/11
Dehumidifier
D70D
1/10/12
Geothermal Heat Pump
GeoSystems, LLC
MG069
12/20/11
Stereo Amplifier
Nigel B. Design Inc.
NB-50050
7/21/11
NB-50050PL
NB-50090
NB-50090PL
NB-70050
NB-70050PL
NB-70090
NB-70090PL
.
Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Gee, I wonder why trial attorneys have a bad name. Fist of all, anyone who knows anything about the Energy Star program knows it's a joke. The public is duped into believing that they are purchasing a high-efficiency appliance, when in reality, they are purchasing an appliance that complies with a convoluted government-sponsored testing program. The testing labs make a fortune, the appliance companies benefit in the form of high appliance prices for "efficient" appliances, and now trial attorneys make some cash by suing appliance makers. Wow, what a country!
Don't you think this wrong should be corrected.There is no one else policing what you yourself admit has dupped the public. If a hard working attorney spends 100's of hours to prove the company has ripped off consumers and gets those consumers compensation should that attorney not be compensated for their time,years of experience and education.If you work for an appliance repair company and you repair a defective product or a product that is badly made you get paid for your time.If you know this is a rip off you should do something to right the wrong rather than crying sour grapes about the world.
The wrong that you speak of is the national Energy Star program that has been created to make consumers feel better about their appliance purchases. Fix the program, don't sue to manufacturers. It's called a shake down, and it happens all the time. An attorney files a class action suit on behalf of consumers who purchased the products. In the case of Energy Star, the standards are so convoluted, with enough testing and re-testing, anyone can show that the appliances missed the mark in one area or another. Instead of fighting the case in court, the manufactures settle. The purchasers receive a pittance while the attorneys make millions.
Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader
Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.
Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.
Drug Injury Watch
Mealey's Legal News
NeuroNotes
SafetyLex
Tricky Rick Santorum
Find a Legal Examiner Blog in your area:
Alabama
Birmingham
Gadsden
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery
Alaska
Anchorage
Fairbanks
Arizona
Chandler
Phoenix
Scottsdale
Tucson
Arkansas
Bentonville
El Dorado
Jonesboro
Little Rock
Mountain Home
Texarkana
Atlantic Canada
Halifax
California
Bakersfield
Chico
Fresno
Glendale
Huntington Beach
Lancaster
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Modesto
Novato
Oakland
Orange County
Redding
Sacramento
San Diego
San Diego County
San Francisco
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
Santa Clarita
Stockton
Ventura
Colorado
Colorado Springs
Denver
Fort Collins
Grand Junction
Connecticut
Hartford
New Haven
Waterbury
District of Columbia
Metro D.C.
Washington
Florida
Bradenton
Central Florida
Clearwater
Dade City
Florida Keys
Fort Lauderdale
Ft. Myers
Gainesville, Ocala & Daytona Beach
Jacksonville
Key West
Melbourne
Miami
Naples
New Port Richey
Orlando
Palm Harbor
Pensacola
Pinellas
Plant City
Port Charlotte
Sarasota
St. Petersburg
Tallahassee
Tampa
Venice
West Palm Beach
Georgia
Atlanta
Hawaii
Honolulu
Idaho
Boise
Illinois
Chicago
Chicago-Land
Cook County
Rockford & Moline
Windy City
Indiana
Bloomington
Indianapolis
Valparaiso, South Bend & Gary
Iowa
Council Bluffs
Davenport
Des Moines
Fort Dodge
Waterloo
Kansas
Kansas City
Topeka
Wichita
Kentucky
Bowling Green
Louisville
Paducah
Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Lafayette
New Orleans
Maine
Bangor & Augusta
Maryland
Baltimore
Massachusetts
Boston
Cape Cod
Eastern Massachusetts
Michigan
Detroit
Farmington Hills
Grand Rapids
Lansing
Traverse City
Minnesota
Minneapolis
Rochester
St. Cloud
St. Paul
Mississippi
Biloxi & Gulfport
Tupelo
Missouri
Jefferson City
Springfield
St. Louis
Montana
Missoula
Nebraska
Lincoln
Omaha
Nevada
Las Vegas
Reno
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Atlantic City
Bergen County
Cherry Hill
Jersey City
Newark
Trenton
New York
Buffalo
Long Island
Milestone Consulting
New York City
Northern New York
Syracuse
North Carolina
Charlotte
Durham
Fayetteville
Greensboro
Greenville, OBX & Rocky Mount
Raleigh
Wilmington
Winston-Salem
Ohio
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dayton
Findlay
Sandusky
Toledo
Oklahoma
Norman
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Oregon
Portland
Pennsylvania
Central Pennsylvania
Harrisburg
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
Providence
South Carolina
Charleston
Columbia
Florence / Myrtle Beach
Greenville
Spartanburg
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Nashville
Texas
Athens
Austin
Beaumont
Brownsville
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Dallas-Fort Worth
Galveston Bay
Houston
Laredo
McAllen
North Dallas
San Antonio
The Alamo City
Tyler
Victoria
Waco
Utah
Salt Lake City
Vermont
Virginia
Charlottesville
Fairfax, Leesburg & Loudoun
Norfolk, Portsmouth & Hampton
Northern Virginia
Richmond
Roanoke
Virginia Beach, Chesapeake & Suffolk
Everett
King County
Olympia
Seattle
Tacoma
Vancouver
West Virginia
Ohio Valley
Wisconsin
Milwaukee
Wyoming
Cheyenne