The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has ordered post-market surveillance on “metal-on-metal” prosthetic hip equipment to assess safety risks associated with the devices.
The FDA’s review comes after a spate of lawsuits challenging metal-on-metal devices manufactured and marketed by DePuy Orthopedics. The lawsuits allege that the metal-on-metal devices can shed tiny particles damaging to bone, muscle, and nerve, complicating revision surgeries.
The FDA is now reviewing the risk-benefit profile and revision surgery rates of hip prostheses by 21 manufacturers. The metal-on-metal devices include a metal ball and socket parts. Other designs are plastic or ceramic, to avoid metal-on-metal contact and wear.
Metal-on-metal hip systems were marketed in the U.S. prior to 1976 legislation that gave the FDA premarket authority over medical devices. These so-called “pre-amendment devices” were automatically designated as Class III (higher risk)devices, but they were regulated under the less rigorous 510(k) premarket notification program.
The FDA is considering reclassifying the device – which could mean that manufacturers conduct studies to gain pre-market approval.
Last August, DePuy Orthopedics recalled its ASR™ XL Acetabular hip system after researchers found 13 percent of patients required a revision surgery to fix problems within five years of the surgery. The New York Times characterized the rate of failure as “unusually high.”
Patient claims against DePuy and Johnson & Johnson for problems associated with the hip implants have been filed in courts of 19 states, and more than 139 federal cases have been filed, according to a Dec. 1, 2010 court filing by Johnson & Johnson’s attorneys.
Sheller, P.C. represents clients nationwide with the recalled hip implant. If you or someone you know has been injured by one of these products, see www.hiprecallhelp.com, or call 1(800)883-2299.
The Legal Examiner and our Affiliate Network strive to be the place you look to for news, context, and more, wherever your life intersects with the law.
Comments for this article are closed.